Let’s say a compliance platform is worth $12,000 per year. Does that sound expensive?
What it replaces will determine the answer.
Automating the collection of evidence across a complex technology system eliminates hundreds of hours of repetitive work then $12,000 is an appropriate amount to spend. If a seven person startup could gather the same evidence in the space of a few hours every month, the amount is quite different.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. The question of which platform offers the best features is not the first step. Ask how many hours and time these features can save your business.
Automated Manufacturing Comes with an End-of-Even
It’s not inherently good or evil. The value of compliance automation will change as the company expands. Imagine a growing technology company that has hundreds of employees multiple cloud environments, many applications, and frequent access changes. Gathering evidence manually could be a major operational burden. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and collect evidence could easily justify the expense.
Imagine a startup of 10 employees preparing for its first SOC 2. audit. Think about a startup that has 10 employees preparing for its first SOC 2.
Vanta pricing is based on this variation. A sophisticated platform can provide significant capabilities, however those capabilities are only beneficial when the organization actually needs these capabilities.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
Searching for Vanta or Drata quickly becomes a feature-by practice. It is essential to look at the services, features, contracts and quotes of both platforms. Both are well-established platform for compliance, which focuses on automation and integrations.
There’s another decision to make before that. Do you have a company that is interested in an integrated platform that can help you achieve compliance? Some businesses prefer continuous monitoring and automated evidence collection and automated evidence gathering. Some companies prefer to provide their own evidence, especially in cases of low workload.
Vanta Competitors Do Not All Utilize the Same Model
A number of well-known Vanta competitors compete within the same automation-oriented category. There are platforms with less cluttered designs which focus more on the system’s organization, rather and connectivity.
CertAssist belongs to the latter category. Created by compliance experts and internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls within a single workspace. It offers editable policies and evidence guidelines, and allows auditors to review evidence submitted with restricted access.
It is not able to connect to operational systems nor install infrastructure agents. Customers upload and choose the documents they would like to present.
Consideration of System Access in the Decision
Removing integrations has an obvious disadvantage: one must collect evidence manually.
This eliminates the need to integrate, and the process of compliance is not dependent on any connection to the operational environment.
Both of these architectures are equally great. Which one is appropriate for your business?
CertAssist will target teams of between five and 200 people. The price is disclosed rather than having to make a sales call to get the first figure. The price for its launch is $225 per month which is compared to a standard price of $375 monthly.
Let Complexity Be In Control
Needs for startups today that has 10 employees aren’t necessarily identical to those of companies with 100 or 500 workers.
A lighter platform can be beneficial while compliance stays simple. The costs of automation will grow as systems, staff and frameworks expand. It’s better to let the complex technology of compliance earn its rightful place.
Don’t buy fifty integrations simply because they look attractive on a comparison chart. You should purchase them only if they are necessary and the cost for doing the task manually is more expensive.